OpenAI Asks Court to Bar Elon Musk From Unfairly Attacking It
In a legal filing, OpenAI asked a federal court to hold Mr. Musk responsible for any damage he has caused the firm, in the latest sign of their bitter feud.
www.nytimes.comHere’s the latest I can provide based on recent reporting.
Core update
- A California federal jury ruled that Elon Musk waited too long to sue OpenAI and its co-founders, delivering a victory to OpenAI and ending that particular lawsuit. The verdict came after a three-week trial and found Musk’s claims time-barred rather than meritorious on the merits. This result effectively closes Musk’s current OpenAI litigation in that forum.
Context and earlier history
- Musk first sued OpenAI in March 2024 in California state court, alleging a breach of contract and deviation from OpenAI’s original nonprofit mission; he later revived or pursued related claims in federal court, which framed ongoing disputes about OpenAI’s business model and governance. These actions followed Musk’s departure from OpenAI and his concern that the company pivoted toward profit-facing activities.
Additional background notes
- OpenAI has faced multiple legal motions and filings over the years as part of this dispute, including attempts to bar Musk from unfairly attacking the company and to address the scope of nondisclosure and profitability transitions. The litigation drew attention in tech and business press due to Musk’s prominence and OpenAI’s market impact.
What this means going forward
- With the May 2026 California verdict, the specific open-ended challenge to OpenAI’s mission-alignment claims appears resolved in favor of OpenAI on the timing issue. If you want, I can pull the latest summaries from major outlets to confirm any follow-on motions or appeals and provide a concise timeline of key filings and dates.
Would you like a concise timeline of the major filings and rulings in this sequence, with sources?